![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Table of Contents | Archives |
![]() Number 7 2005 |
Foreword to “His Father’s House”
Williams’s previously unpublished story, entitled “His Father’s House,” is a typescript located at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University of Texas. To the best of my knowledge this is the only extant copy of the story, and I have found no other variations under different titles at other repositories. Since the story is undated, one can only speculate as to when it was written. However, there are a couple of clues that might offer an approximate date of composition. |
|||
|
¶ 2 |
First, the story is signed “Thomas Lanier Williams,” which suggests that it was written prior to 1938, when Williams acquired his nom de plume. Secondly, Williams scholar Allean Hale sees certain thematic parallels between “His Father’s House” and a short story written around 1937, entitled “De Preachuh’s Boy,” which also features an African American character and contains religious elements. In this respect both of these unpublished stories adumbrate “Desire and the Black Masseur,” which was written in 1946. |
|||
|
¶ 4 |
Other autobiographical details emerge during the course of the story, such as the narrator’s clumsy dancing with the girl (Williams’s sister Rose tried to teach him how to dance), his fascination with the crucifix (surely related to Williams’s adoration of his grandfather Dakin, an Episcopal priest), and the frightful image of the absent father (parallel with Williams’s fear of his own father, Cornelius). In addition, the last haunting line of the story, “Every man must live in his father’s house,” resonates with Williams’s own irrefragable burden of heredity, as his paternal bloodline bequeathed him the predisposition of alcoholism. Although the story might not rank among Williams’s more mature, accomplished short fiction, his adroit handling of tone, voice, and unsettling subject matter in “His Father’s House” demonstrates a young writer whose imaginative power, even in its nascent period, still manages to engage as well as disturb the reader. |
|||
|
|
| © Copyright 2005, The Tennessee Williams Annual Review. All rights reserved. |